Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
https://fnote.me/notes/h4QWGB are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.
https://geisler-mollerup-2.technetbloggers.de/what-is-the-safest-distance-from-a-5g-cell-tower-system-1682543121 of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
While safe distance from cell tower sounds like something that's good however, those living close to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.