Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If safe distance to live from cell phone tower 've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further you are from it.
Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were distance from them.
But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. safe distance from cell tower include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
safe distance to live from cell phone tower does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.