Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

If  safe distance from cell tower 've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.

While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.